понедельник, 14 декабря 2015 г.

The End

     Before I`ve never thought that I would ever have my own blog. This experience was very useful for me. Blogging helped me easier share my thoughts with people. I liked to work in this way. 
     The course of Stylistic was very useful this year. With the help of it now I can enjoy not only great stories but also absorb not noticeable elements that are not accessible for common reader. 
    I hope, that since this time I will be more attentive in reading books and won`t make quick judgements as I used to do before.
      Thank you!

Stylistic Analysis "The Yellow Wallpaper"

The story under analysis belongs to American writer and social reformer Charlotte Perkins Gilman. She was born on July 3, 1860, in Hartford, Connecticut. 
Gilman married artist Charles Stetson in 1884. The couple had a daughter named Katherine. Sometime during her decade-long marriage to Stetson, Gilman experienced a severe depression and underwent a series of unusual treatments for it. This experience is believed to have inspired her best-known short story "The Yellow Wallpaper" (1892).
  While she is best known for her fiction, Gilman was also a successful lecturer and intellectual. One of her greatest works of nonfiction is “Women and Economics". A feminist, she called for women to gain economic independence, and the work helped cement her standing as a social theorist. It was even used as a textbook at one time. Other important nonfiction works followed, such as “The Home: It`s Work and Influence” (1903) and “Does a Man Support His Wife”? (1915).
 In 1900, Gilman had married for the second time, her cousin George Gilman, and the two stayed together until his death in 1934. The next year she discovered that she had inoperable breast cancer. Charlotte Perkins Gilman committed suicide on August 17, 1935.
The title of the story is "The Yellow Wallpaper" is suggestive and thought-provoking. When I saw the title, I couldn`t even imagine how psychologically deep is this story. But let us return to the title.
I thought that this story will be about mentally ill people or about asylum. Once I`ve read that asylums used to be painted in yellow and partially my predictions were right but still so much left hidden up to the moment I`ve read the story.
The actions in the story take place in the colonial period. The narrator and her physician husband, John, have rented a mansion for the summer so that she can recuperate from a “slight hysterical tendency.” Although the narrator does not believe that she is actually ill, John is convinced that she is suffering from “neurasthenia” and prescribes the “rest cure” treatment. She is confined to bed rest in a former nursery room and is forbidden from working or writing. The spacious, sunlit room has yellow wallpaper – stripped off in two places – with a hideous, chaotic pattern. The narrator detests the wallpaper, but John refuses to change rooms, arguing that the nursery is best-suited for her recovery.
Two weeks later, the narrator’s condition has worsened. She feels a constant sense of anxiety and fatigue and can barely muster enough energy to write in her secret journal. Fortunately, their nanny, Mary, takes care of their baby, and John's sister, Jennie, is a perfect housekeeper. The narrator's irritation with the wallpaper grows; she discovers a recurring pattern of bulbous eyes and broken necks, as well as the faint image of a skulking figure stuck behind the pattern.
As more days pass, the narrator grows increasingly anxious and depressed. The wallpaper provides her only stimulation, and she spends the majority of her time studying its confusing patterns which, as she asserts, are almost as “good as gymnastics.” The image of the figure stooping down and "creeping" around behind the wallpaper becomes clearer each day. By moonlight, she can see very distinctly that the figure is a woman trapped behind bars.
The narrator's health improves as her interest in the wallpaper deepens. At night, the woman in the wallpaper shakes the bars in the pattern violently as she tries to break through them, but she cannot break free. The swirling pattern has strangled the heads of the many women who have tried to break through the wallpaper. The narrator begins to hallucinate, believing that she has seen the woman creeping surreptitiously outside in the sunlight. The narrator intends to peel off the wallpaper before she leaves the house in two days.
The next night, the narrator locks herself in her room and continues stripping the wallpaper. She hears shrieks within the wallpaper as she tears it off. She contemplates jumping out of a window, but the bars prevent that; besides, she is afraid of all of the women that are creeping about outside of the house. When morning comes, the narrator has peeled off all of the wallpaper and begun to creep around the perimeter of the room. John eventually breaks into the room, but the narrator does not recognize him. She informs him that she has peeled off most of the wallpaper so that now no one can put her back inside the walls. John faints, and the narrator continues creeping around the room over him.
One of the main ideas of this story is a life of a woman in 18-19 century, the relations in family and in general the position in society. As we may see it from the story it is not at all what we are having now.
 Women were deprived of many things that they can do now.  Men were expected to live a public life, whether it was working in a factory or socializing with like-minded men in public places, like clubs, meetings, or bars. On the other hand, women were usually expected to live their lives largely homebound, taking care of the cooking, cleaning, and child rearing. Free time for women was not supposed to be spent socializing but doing other things related to the maintenance of the family, from sewing socks to laundry.
Largely due to these traditional expectations for women prior to the 19th century, very few women had the same opportunities for education as men. Indeed, educating women was often seen as subversive, a possible perversion of the correct social order. Women were also entirely shut out of political activity. Women were not allowed to vote, and in Great Britain, women were so bound to their husbands that under 19th-century British common law, they were barely considered people at all.
Today, we are able to choose study, socialize and do whatever we want or like and this story is definitely useful to read for women in order to compare positions they obtain and that women used to obtain.
As to the type of narration, this story is written in 1st person narrative. The actions are described by the narrator, whose name we don`t know. She experiences all the events by herself and she tells them from her point of view.
The reader absorbs deeper in her story by getting true descriptions, but on the other way knowing just one point of view and having no additional information, judgements we can`t know for sure what was happening as we know that the narrator obviously had mental problems.
Contextual type of this story is narration with elements of description, meditation. We don`t have descriptions of characters of this story. We may get information only from their actions. The author pays attention to the description of the house, of the rooms. It helps the reader to absorb into the setting, to fell the atmosphere of the house and to imagine the life of the characters with more details.
The story is a secret journal of the narrator and she writes down all her thoughts there, though she is forbidden to. That is her way to share the information she can`t share with others, she knows they won`t understand her.
Compositional structure of this text is not full; there is no introduction and conclusion.
·        Exposition: this part of story gives us some information about the characters and reasons they went to the countryside.
·        Plot development: the narrator writes about her everyday life, describes, shares with the reader her secret thoughts that she writes down in her secret journal and complains about the miserableness of her state.
·        Climax: the characters feels the connection between her and the women from the wall, she wants to set that woman free and the highest point is that she loses her mind completely.
·        Anticlimax: the husband enters the room and sees his wife crawling in the room and faints.
And now shall we look at the characters of the story.
Narrator
The narrator in “The Yellow Wallpaper” is a young wife and mother who has recently began to suffer symptoms of depression and anxiety. Although she does not believe that anything is wrong with her, John, her physician husband, diagnoses her with neurasthenia and prescribes several months of “rest cure.”
 In addition to being confined to the nursery in their rented summer home, the narrator is expressly forbidden to write or engage in any creative activity.
The narrator desperately wants to please her husband and assume her role as an ideal mother and wife, but she is unable to balance her husband’s needs with her desire to express her creativity. While attempting to adhere to John’s wishes for the most part, the narrator secretly writes in her journal. Over the course of the story, the narrator also begins to find comfort in the hideous yellow wallpaper that covers the walls of the nursery. She gradually begins to see a female figure trapped behind the bar-like pattern of the wallpaper and realizes that both she and the figure are suffering from oppression and imprisonment. As the narrator becomes more and more preoccupied with the pattern of the wallpaper, she forgets her desire to become the perfect wife and mother and thinks only of a way to release the imprisoned woman from the wallpaper.
By the end of the story, the narrator has lost all sense of reality, and John discovers her creeping around the perimeter of the nursery, following the endless pattern of the wallpaper.
John
The husband of the narrator, John is a practical physician who believes that his wife is suffering from nothing more than a “slight hysterical tendency.” He prescribes the “rest cure,” confining the narrator to the nursery and forbidding her to exercise her creative imagination in any way.
Throughout the story, he treats her in an infantile manner, referring to her as his “blessed little goose” and “little girl.” Moreover, when the narrator attempts to discuss her unhappiness with the situation in a mature manner, he refuses to accept her as an equal and simply carries her back up to the nursery for more bed rest. He is fixed in his authoritative position as husband and doctor and cannot adapt his strategy to account for her opinion on the matter. He believes in a strict divide between men and women; men work outside of the home, as he does, while women like Jennie, his sister, and Mary, the nanny, tend to the house.
Although John is set up as the villain of the story, he can also be seen as a more sympathetic character. He clearly loves his wife and relies on her for his own happiness. Yet he is unable to reconcile her creative desires with his own rationality or the chauvinistic expectations of the time period. His wife is unable or unwilling to adhere to the ideal model of domesticity expressed by the 19th-century society, and John is at a loss as to what to do. His solution is to use rest cure to cure his wife, and he does not realize that his own actions push her over the edge of insanity.
I think that one more character of the story is Woman in the wallpaper.
Although the narrator eventually believes that she sees many women in the yellow wallpaper, she centers on one in particular. The woman appears to be trapped within the bar-like pattern of the wallpaper, and she shakes the pattern as she tries to break out. The woman is most active by moonlight, a symbol of femininity and a sign that John’s strict daytime regimen is no longer applicable to the narrator.
Over time, as the narrator’s insanity deepens, she identifies completely with this woman and believes that she, too, is trapped within the wallpaper. The woman in the wallpaper also symbolizes female imprisonment within the domestic sphere. Unable to break free from the room, like the narrator, the woman in the wallpaper has only the symbolic option of tending to the house as a wife or mother.
Jennie
Jennie is the narrator’s sister-in-law and takes care of the house during the narrator’s illness. Although she does not play an active role in the narrative, she is a constant reminder of the narrator's inability to assume her proper role as John's wife and housekeeper.
Mary
Mary takes care of the narrator and John's baby. Mary is even less present in the text than Jennie; she still serves to remind the narrator of her personal failings as a 19th century woman, particularly in terms of her own child.
Vocabulary of the story is mostly bookish, there no cases of slang, jargon but we may find here several examples of  medical terms: “physician”, “phosphates or phosphite”, “temporary nervous depression”, “a slight hysterical tendency”.
As to the stylistic devices applied here, we may see:
·               Parenthesis:
“I would not say it to a living soul, of course, but this is dead paper and a great relief to my mind” , “there is something strange about the house”, “kind of " debased Romanesque" with delirium tremens” , “privately”, “I always watch for that first long, straight ray”, “the moon shines in all night when there is a moon”, “she turned around as if she had been caught stealing, and looked quite angry” – all these cases of parenthesis are used to show the chaotic way of thinking of the main character, she couldn`t concentrate on what she was writing.
·               Repetitions:
“…perhaps -(I would not say it to a living soul, of course, but this is dead paper and a great relief to my mind -) perhaps that is one reason I do not get well faster.”,  “But he said I wasn't able to go, nor" able to stand it after I got there…” , “The color is hideous enough, and unreliable enough, and infuriating enough, but the pattern is torturing.”, “Round and round and round -round and round and round -it makes me dizzy!” – these cases of repetition are used to put emphasis on the repetition of routine every day.
·               Parallel constructions :
“I don't know why I should write this. I don't want to. I don't feel able.”, “Personally, I disagree with their ideas. Personally, I believe that congenial work, with excitement and change, would do me good.” – to show the moral state of the main character.
·               Polysyndetons:
“So I take phosphates or phosphites whichever it is, and tonics, and journeys, and air, and exercise, and am absolutely forbidden to "work" until I am well again.”, “It makes me think of English places that you read about, for there are hedges and walls and gates that lock, and lots of separate little houses for the gardeners and people.”, “He said that after the wall-paper was changed it would be the heavy bedstead, and then the barred windows, and then that gate at the head of the stairs, and so on.”, “And dear John gathered me up in his arms, and just carried me upstairs and laid me on the bed, and sat by me and read to me till it tired my head.”,
 “He said I was his darling and his comfort and all he had, and that I must take care of myself for his sake, and keep well.” – these cases of polysyndeton were used to give more dynamism to the utterances.
·               Asyndetons:
“It is quite alone, standing well back from the road, quite three miles from the village.”, “You are gaining flesh and color, your appetite is better, I feel really much easier about you.”, “I find it hovering in the dining-room, skulking in the parlor, hiding in the hall, lying in wait for me on the stairs.” – are used for showing the chaotic way of thinking of the main character.
·               Epithets:
“physician of high standing”, “a delicious garden”, “sprawling flamboyant patterns”, “The color…repellant, revolt…”, “a smoldering unclean yellow”, “atrocious nursery”, “blessed little goose”, “riotous old-fashioned flowers”, “velvet meadows”, “optic horror” – these epithets were used to give more expressiveness and vividness to the text.
·               Similes:
“lie awake as a child”, “chair that always seemed like a strong friend”, “it as good as gymnastics” – were used to make utterances more understandable trough the comparison with some other objects.
·               Oxymoron: “positively angry” – to show that the character is confusing the states in her mind.
In the text there are also cases of capitalization like: perhaps, does, delicious, draught, reason… . It was used to emphasize some points in the text in order the reader to pay attention on these places.
To sum up, I would like to say that this story is worth reading and reading for several times. Reading the story for one more time helped to get me in it deeper. I`ve caught details that I haven`t notice before. Besides the story of the main heroine, there is great mystery that gives effect of closeness. For a moment I`ve imagined all the main character went through.
Charlotte Perkins is an amazing writer, her work is really detailed description and his description gives us a chance to imagine more precisely all the things that main character went through.
Now I would like to read other her works and compare how changed her literary style through years.
Thank you Victoria Viktorivna,  for a chance to open a new page in American literature about which I had no idea.


вторник, 8 декабря 2015 г.

Let`s Look Closer

In the story were applied such stylistic devises: 

·             Repetitions:
“…perhaps -(I would not say it to a living soul, of course, but this is dead paper and a great relief to my mind -) perhaps that is one reason I do not get well faster.”,  “But he said I wasn't able to go, nor" able to stand it after I got there…” , “The color is hideous enough, and unreliable enough, and infuriating enough, but the pattern is torturing.”, “Round and round and round -round and round and round -it makes me dizzy!” – these cases of repetition are used to put emphasis on the repetition of routine every day.
·             Parallel constructions :
“I don't know why I should write this. I don't want to. I don't feel able.”, “Personally, I disagree with their ideas. Personally, I believe that congenial work, with excitement and change, would do me good.” – to show the moral state of the main character.
·              Polysyndetons:
“So I take phosphates or phosphites whichever it is, and tonics, and journeys, and air, and exercise, and am absolutely forbidden to "work" until I am well again.”, “It makes me think of English places that you read about, for there are hedges and walls and gates that lock, and lots of separate little houses for the gardeners and people.”, “He said that after the wall-paper was changed it would be the heavy bedstead, and then the barred windows, and then that gate at the head of the stairs, and so on.”, “And dear John gathered me up in his arms, and just carried me upstairs and laid me on the bed, and sat by me and read to me till it tired my head.”, “He said I was his darling and his comfort and all he had, and that I must take care of myself for his sake, and keep well.” – these cases of polysyndeton were used to give more dynamism to the utterances.
·            Asyndetons:
“It is quite alone, standing well back from the road, quite three miles from the village.”, “You are gaining flesh and colour, your appetite is better, I feel really much easier about you.”, “I find it hovering in the dining-room, skulking in the parlor, hiding in the hall, lying in wait for me on the stairs.” – are used for showing the chaotic way of thinking of the main character.
·            Epithets:
“physician of high standing”, “a delicious garden”, “sprawling flamboyant patterns”, “The colour…repellent, revolt…”, “a smouldering unclean yellow”, “atrocious nursery”, “blessed little goose”, “riotous old-fashioned flowers”, “velvet meadows”, “optic horror” – these epithets were used to give more expressiveness and vividness to the text.
·            Similes:
“lie awake as a child”, “chair that always seemed like a strong friend”, “it as good as gymnastics” – were used to make utterances more understandable trough the comparison with some other objects.
·         Oxymoron: “positively angry” – to show that the character is confusing the states in her mind.

The characters of the story

      The main character of the story is the narrator herself. Unfortunately we don`t know her name. This woman seems to have serious mental problems, she has a depression but she considers that everything is fine with her. The whole story the main character writes her secret journal, though because of her disease she is forbidden to do this. 
     So she was brought to this summer house as one of the possible ways to cure her but unfortunately it became even worse, she lost the sense of reality.
       The next character is John. He is a husband of the main character, practical physician, who believes that his wife is ill and needs to be cured. He is rarely at home and this was usual thing for men in 19 century to have some sort of social life and women were supposed to stay at home and play a role of a housewife.
       Jennie  is John`s sister. In this house she has a role of the housewife. This character  has no active role in the story.
      Mary is a nanny for he main character`s baby. She has not appeared in the text and was only mentioned by the narrator.


понедельник, 7 декабря 2015 г.

Plot

And now let`s look closer at the  structure of the plot of the story.
·        Exposition: this part of story gives us some information about the characters and reasons they went to the countryside.
·        Plot development: the narrator writes about her everyday life, describes, shares with the reader her secret thoughts that she writes down in her secret journal and complains about the miserableness of her state.
·        Climax: the characters feels the connection between her and the women from the wall, she wants to set that woman free and the highest point is that she loses her mind completely.

·        Anticlimax: the husband enters the room and sees his wife crawling in the room and faints.

Composition and Type of Narration

As to the type of narration, this story is written in 1st person narrative. The actions are described by the narrator, whose name we don`t know. She experiences all the events by herself and she tells them from her point of view.



















The reader absorbs deeper in her story by getting true descriptions, but on the other way knowing just one point of view and having no additional information, judgements we can`t know for sure what was happening as we know that the narrator obviously had mental problems.
Contextual type of this story is narration with elements of description, meditation. We don`t have descriptions of characters of this story. We may get information only from their actions. The author pays attention to the description of the house, of the rooms. It helps the reader to absorb into the setting, to fell the atmosphere of the house and to imagine the life of the characters with more details.
The story is a secret journal of the narrator and she writes down all her thoughts there, though she is forbidden to. That is her way to share the information she can`t share with others, she knows they won`t understand her. 

воскресенье, 22 ноября 2015 г.

The setting of the story

      The actions in  the story take place in the colonial period. All the events happen in one mansion that stands quite far away from other houses. At the beginning the main character even liked that house but still she felt something strange about that house. 
       We get to know from the text about two rooms in the house. One was airy with piazza and roses, the other one was the room where all the events happened. The main heroine didn`t like that room at all and ironically she had to stay there all the time. 
       Those wallpapers created the atmosphere of  mystery and horror in a way. The most part of the story is based on the actions that concern these wallpapers and  the story didn`t become boring up to the end. I think hat Charlotte Perkins had an amazing talent to writing  such kind of stories.

Reading the story one more time

Reading the story for one more time helped to get me in it deeper. I`ve caught details  that I didn`t notice before. Besides the story of the main heroine, there is great mystery that gives effect  of closeness. For a moment I`ve imagined all the main character went through. I thing after reading the story for one more I will discover something else.


   

суббота, 21 ноября 2015 г.

THE LIFE AND WORK OF CHARLOTTE PERKINS GILMAN


        Charlotte Perkins Gilman was born on July 3, 1860, in Hartford, Connecticut. She published her best-known short story "The Yellow Wall-Paper" in 1892. One of her greatest works of non-fiction, Women and Economics, was published in 1898. Along with writing books, she established a magazine, The Forerunner, which was published from 1909 to 1916. Gilman committed suicide on August 17, 1935, in Pasadena, California.

Early Life

Writer and social reformer Charlotte Perkins Gilman was born on July 3, 1860, in Hartford, Connecticut. Gilman was a writer and social activist during the late 1800s and early 1900s. She had a difficult childhood. Her father, Frederick Beecher Perkins was a relative of well-known and influential Beecher family, including the writer Harriet Beecher Stowe. But he abandoned the family, leaving Charlotte's mother to raise two children on her own. Gilman moved around a lot as a result and her education suffered greatly for it.

Marriage and Inspiration

         Gilman married artist Charles Stetson in 1884. The couple had a daughter named Katherine. Sometime during her decade-long marriage to Stetson, Gilman experienced a severe depression and underwent a series of unusual treatments for it. This experience is believed to have inspired her best-known short story "The Yellow Wall-Paper" (1892).

Women's Rights Activism

          While she is best known for her fiction, Gilman was also a successful lecturer and intellectual. One of her greatest works of nonfiction, Women and Economics, was published in 1898. A feminist, she called for women to gain economic independence, and the work helped cement her standing as a social theorist. It was even used as a textbook at one time. Other important nonfiction works followed, such as The Home: Its Work and Influence (1903) and Does a Man Support His Wife? (1915).
Along with writing books, Charlotte Perkins Gilman established The Forerunner, a magazine that allowed her to express her ideas on women's issues and on social reform. It was published from 1909 to 1916 and included essays, opinion pieces, fiction, poetry and excerpts from novels.

Suicide

        In 1900, Gilman had married for the second time. She wed her cousin George Gilman, and the two stayed together until his death in 1934. The next year she discovered that she had inoperable breast cancer. Charlotte Perkins Gilman committed suicide on August 17, 1935.

четверг, 5 ноября 2015 г.

What we are going to read?

    The story is entitled "The Yellow Wallpaper " by Charlotte Perkins Stetson.
       When I started reading the story, I decided for myself that I won`t like it. But I was mistaken, the ending of the story surprised me. I didn`t expect that the story might have such scenario  and I`ve got some thoughts after reading  that will share with you but a little bit later.
       The descriptions of the events are so precise that it is very easy to imagine the whole situation at once and even in a way to feel the state of the main character. I will read it one more time with pleasure to get into the story deeper.

My first post ever!!!

Hello!
Welcome to my blog)) 
Actually, this is my first experience having a blog. It was not a big deal to create it.  At first I felt confused, because that is something new for me. I`m glad to have such an opportunity to share my own thoughts and ideas. Who knows, may be I will like it and in future blogging will help me share my thoughts with the whole world.